Blog posts

There is no doubt that there are problems with the Social Security program. It is estimated that the program’s funds will be entirely depleted of funds 2023, if not sooner. This obviously has created a lot of concern and stirred up heated debates at the government level and otherwise. Those who oppose the Social Security Disability program, in particular, claim that a large number of the people who are receiving disability benefits should phased out of the benefits system and put back into the work force.

People applying for disability benefits through Social Security Disability are often surprised to find out that the majority of claimants must undergo a lengthy and complex disability appeal in order to get the benefits they need – a process that can take more than two years to complete. Given the tremendous time and effort that goes into the fight to obtain disability benefits in the first place, many people wonder is whether there is a time limit on benefits once the SSA has approved a Social Security Disability claim.

It is difficult for hard-working taxpayers to view news reports about the discovery of Social Security Disability fraud every day. It is important, however, not to let such frustrations lead to a slanted view of the Social Security Administration or the Social Security Disability program as a whole.

The rumor mill is ablaze and many people are asking whether or not Social Security and Medicare are really in as much trouble as people are predicting. We all knew that the Social Security and Medicare programs were in desperate need of reform, but are they really losing funds faster than anticipated and are the benefits that recipients are currently receiving really at stake? While Social Security checks will not be stopping anytime soon, the outlook is definitely concerning.

When bad credit comes back to haunt those who are dependent on monthly government payouts, it often has devastating effects. The retired, elderly, disabled, and veterans are the ones who suffer the most when creditors come knocking, because they rely on their income, which usually consists entirely of benefit payments from government programs, to provide their basic necessities.

The Social Security Administration and the U.S. Government are not playing games when it comes to fraudulent Social Security Disability claims. The requirements for reporting changes are made clear to claimants before they begin receiving benefits. Those who are receiving benefits but are unclear about the requirements to continue receiving benefits would be well advised to consult a Social Security Disability lawyer.

Most would agree that the Social Security Administration is not against marriage. In its own interests, it really has no reason to have one bias or the other. However, disgruntled Social Security Disability beneficiaries are finding it hard not to make this conclusion, based on their personal experience.

There is no doubt that the Social Security Disability application process can be confusing, if not downright-overwhelming, for many disability applicants. Many people do not even know where to begin the Social Security Disability application process. A question that many would-be disability applicants ask is whether or not they actually have to go into their local Social Security office to apply for disability benefits. Some are unable to leave their homes and worry that they cannot obtain benefits because they cannot make it to the Social Security office for an appointment.

Federal Employee Retirement System (FERS) benefits are a type of government benefit payment available only to federal employees upon reaching retirement. It is not, as is sometimes mistaken, a type of Social Security Disability program. There is a completely separate provision for disability benefits under FERS.

Citizens as well as politicians have long been voicing their discontent with the practices of the Title XVI program run by the Social Security Administration, but the growing universal concern over the impending bankruptcy of Social Security has led to more public outcry over the abuses of the program and how it is contributing to the financially instability of the system.